With earnings season nearly complete, the Corbin team wants to express our gratitude to each client that continues to place trust in us as we navigate more volatile times and, with that, more uncertain investors.
Amidst this week’s market volatility, we observed an increase in sell side questions about a potential recession within the Q&A portion of earnings calls. We expect these questions to become more prevalent in discussions with analysts and investors in the coming weeks during remaining earnings calls, sell side conferences, and investor meetings.
Questions primarily centered around several key areas, including:
Each quarter, we analyze annual revenue and EPS guidance provided by Materials companies with market caps greater than $1B that have reported to date.1 Below are our findings.
For comparison purposes, we provide an “All-Company” benchmark, which tracks in real-time a basket of companies larger than $1B in market cap across all sectors that have reported earnings to date (n = 688).
Industry | Number of Companies |
---|---|
Chemicals | 18 |
Containers & Packaging | 9 |
Construction Materials | 2 |
Metals & Mining | 2 |
Total | 31 |
More Materials companies are lowering annual revenue guidance figures than the all-company average. Of note, the majority of those lowering guidance came from chemical companies, which also represent the largest contingent within the sector to provide guidance thus far.
Materials Guidance
More Materials companies are maintaining annual EPS guides than raising or lowering, though 11% fewer are raising versus the benchmark.
Materials Guidance
We analyzed the earnings calls for this group and the broader Materials sector universe to identify key themes.
In last quarter’s Materials Sector Beat, we reported that executive commentary reflected an industry still in flux, with varied outlooks across end markets but showing more signs of optimism for demand to normalize as the year progressed. In that regard, this quarter has “played out as expected” with destocking in the rearview and volumes getting a near-term boost from pockets of restocking. At the same time, some end markets remain challenged, and outlooks are tempered by a softening economic backdrop and persistent macro headwinds, including inflation, higher rates, election uncertainty, and ongoing geopolitical tensions.
As with last quarter, demand trends are mixed and vary across end markets. Indeed, while areas of restocking have recently been supportive of volumes, overall commentary reflects a demand environment that continues to be characterized as bottoming/stabilizing rather than accelerating, with many expecting these conditions to persist through the rest of the year. As such, the proportion of Materials companies lowering top-line guides is more than double the all-company benchmark.
Rather than counting on resurgent volumes, executives are squarely focused on controlling what they can control, highlighting expense management and productivity initiatives — and, in some cases, headcount reduction — that are starting to bear fruit and drive margin expansion. Meanwhile, commentary is more mixed around pricing and input costs; while some point to moderating inflation and improving pricing, others highlight pricing pressures (particularly in China and in end markets impacted by an increasingly price-conscious consumer) as well as idiosyncratic raw material challenges.
Finally, with elevated U.S. election (and policy) uncertainty, trade tensions and the impact from tariffs and anti-dumping measures remained top of mind, garnering further attention during analyst Q&A. Executives note that whoever wins in November, the expectation is for a heightened tariff enforcement environment, and executives are refreshing their playbooks accordingly.
As of Thursday, the S&P 500 Materials sector was the worst performing group within the benchmark for the week, down roughly 1.5%. Furthermore, the sector is among the worst YTD performers for the index, up less than 4% and surpassing only Real Estate and Consumer Discretionary sectors.
Coming into the quarter, the Materials sector lagged the S&P 500 by ~7% since our last coverage on May 10th, though the sector has closed the gap somewhat of late amid recent market volatility. Since July 17th, the day the first S&P 500 Materials company, Steel Dynamics, reported earnings, the Materials sector is down roughly 3.5% versus 5% for the broader index.
Key Earnings Call Themes
Sector Challenges Have “Played Out as Expected”, though Execs are “Keeping a Close Eye” on Persistent Macro Headwinds; While Demand is Seen as Having Bottomed/Stabilized, Lack of Acceleration Has Prompted Lowered Revenue Guides for Some, but Interest Rate Relief Expected to be a Tailwind into 2025
Trends Through Q2 are Mixed and Vary by End Market, though Weakness is Noted for Many Across the Sector; Still, Most Assert Destocking has “Run Its Course”, With Chemicals and Packaging Companies Seeing Green Shoots for a Recovery
Destocking / Restocking
Amid Largely Sluggish Volume Environment, Executives Point to Expense Management and Productivity Initiatives Coming to Fruition, Including Headcount Reductions for Some
Commentary is a Mixed Bag; While Some Highlight an Improving Pricing and Moderating Cost Environment, Others Face Competitive Pressures and Raw Material Challenges
Chinese “Dumping” Low-Cost Imports are Under the Microscope as Executives and Analysts Anticipate a Heightened Tariff Enforcement Environment
The Materials sector, a barometer for the broader economy, continues to reflect the complexities and challenges of the current economic landscape. While last quarter indicated a move towards slow but steady stabilization with hopes of a back-half recovery, commentary in Q2 earnings suggests many of the persistent challenges observed over the past few quarters have remained just that — persistent. This has led to downward pressure on top-line guides, particularly as companies grapple with ongoing inflation, interest rate headwinds, and demand that is not yet described as accelerating.
Still, as has been the case for many this quarter, the message coming out of the sector has been controlling what can be controlled, prioritizing expense management and productivity initiatives, and some “green shoots” are emerging in select areas.
Next week, we’ll be back with our Closing the Quarter piece to round out the Q2’24 reporting period.